amanda beaster medical writing career path jobs CRO vendor mms holdings

In the early 2000s, I sat in an undergraduate microbiology lab and caught the bug. It was not a laboratory-acquired infection, but inspiration from a world only seen under the microscope.

The order and the vast unknown was intriguing, leading me to expand my understanding of all things small with courses in parasitology and cell biology. At the same time, I began to realize just how much was left to be discovered. It was an exciting time in molecular biology. The human genome, approximately 3 billion nucleotides, was on the cusp of being sequenced for the first time, and it seemed as if new tools and technologies were revolutionizing the industry on a regular basis. However, pursuing microbiology as a career ultimately came down to the amount of human suffering that these pathogens still caused.

Pouring myself into the science

I knew I had found my calling after seeing people suffer from of the same diseases that humans were suffering from hundreds of years ago, including plague, measles, tuberculosis, filarial disease, and so much more. Diving deeper into my studies, a degree in biology suddenly became a portal, a way to help people who needed it.

In my mind, medical research was the way to address these issues, and that is how doctorate studies became a reality – applying my skillset to the academic machine to help produce change. I learned so much in the lab, everything from sterile procedure to cell culture and experimental design, and much more. Nevertheless, I found that I loved critical thinking the most.

I am extremely grateful to those that take on the mammoth responsibilities and challenges of basic science research, but I also saw the effects that a lack of funding can have.

Moving to the other end of the drug development pipeline

One day, I read a statement from the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding superbugs, and an early warning that if new antibiotics weren’t developed, the public would soon regularly be facing infections with no cures. Looking closer, this was already happening – people were dying from infections that were once considered treatable.

I wanted to do something to help make a difference in the lives of patients. I began looking into “alternative career paths” and eventually found medical writing.

Making a difference through medical writing

It was as a medical writer that I first began to develop drugs in earnest. While the industry is a demanding one, I have learned from excellent mentors, a large amount of self-study, and countless training hours to understand the regulations and how to help sponsors bring treatments to market.

Medical writing allowed me to take part – no matter how big or small – in some exiting breakthroughs, including new drugs to treat old diseases in adults and children. It was in 2017 that my career came full circle when I supported the writing of a new drug application (NDA) that led to the approval of omadacycline, a tetracycline class antibacterial.

It was incredible to play a part in the development of a drug that will make the type of difference I was inspired to pursue all those years ago in an undergraduate laboratory.

Developing treatments, therapies, and sometimes, cures, is what medical writing is about. There are now treatments that can be used for whoever may need them, whether someone in my family or a stranger on the other side of the world, that I helped make available. That is what makes this end of the drug development pipeline the right end for me.

by Amanda Beaster, Ph.D.

About the author

Amanda Beaster, Ph.D. is Senior Technical Manager, Medical and Regulatory Writing at MMS based in Canton, Mich. Dr. Beaster is a thought leader in pharmaceutical industry regulations and earned her doctorate in philosophy, microbiology and immunology, from the University of South Alabama. Fun fact: Dr. Beaster initially wanted to have a career as a journalist for National Geographic magazine.

Suggested For You

perspectives

July 22nd, 2025

Career Insights: From Military Service to Regulatory Strategy – Ritchie Patton’s Journey at MMS

perspectives

June 3rd, 2025

Choosing the Right Strategy: Parallel, Sequential, and Staggered Regulatory Submissions 

perspectives

May 21st, 2024

Psychedelics and Regulatory Considerations Part II: A Shift in Lexicon and Implications of “Nonmedical Use” On Labelling

perspectives

May 10th, 2024

Psychedelics in Drug Development and Regulatory Considerations Part I: Benefit-Risk

perspectives

November 16th, 2023

New Investigator Updates and the Need to Keep Your Clinical Study Protocol Up-to-Date

perspectives

November 11th, 2023

The Silent Battle: Exploring PTSD Treatments and Psychedelic Research in Veteran Care

perspectives

October 26th, 2023

Psychedelic Drug Development is Here: What You Need to Know

perspectives

August 24th, 2023

“D” is for Discipline: Everything You Need to Know About FDA's Type D Meetings

perspectives

August 2nd, 2023

Single-Arm Trials and Drug Approval in the European Union (EU)

perspectives

June 6th, 2023

5 Reasons to Get Excited About the FDA DSUR Format

perspectives

March 16th, 2023

New FDA Policies and Procedures for Products Submitted Under Accelerated Pathways : Understanding CDER MAPP 5015.13

perspectives

March 7th, 2023

SENDing Successful Nonclinical Submissions through Validation, Review, and Beyond