Navigating Electronic SOPs in Pharma: 4 Critical Compliance Steps

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in the pharmaceutical industry are documents used by an organization to provide step-by-step actions for a specific process. And, according to a published study in ResearchGate, a typical pharmaceutical company must manage an average of 1,250 SOPs with average maintenance taking more than 15,000 hours per company.

Properly-written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in the pharmaceutical industry are essential, as they can reduce mistakes and miscommunication, as well as ensure reliability and consistency across departments.

Creating Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in an electronic system provides a new set of challenges and elevates the level of scrutiny by global regulatory entities during health authority inspections to ensure proper and complete compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11).

To meet regulatory expectations, there are four necessary steps to get companies on the road to compliance once the decision is made to move Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in the pharmaceutical industry into an electronic system.

Step 1: Validating the Electronic System

Any electronic system used for generating or housing GxP data, including approved procedures for performing acts related to generating GxP data, should be properly validated.

The level of validation should be based on a justified and documented risk assessment and a determination of the potential of the system to affect product quality and safety and record integrity. The validation process should include a determination of user access, the need for written procedures for use of the system, and a determination of how the system will be managed.

Step 2: Ensuring Data Integrity

All electronic systems used for housing or generating GxP data should go through a data integrity analysis. The system used for Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in the pharmaceutical industry should be no exception.

The goal of this analysis is to ensure full compliance with the Principles of Alcoa+ per the FDA and EMA expectations.

Alcoa+ per the FDA and EMA expectations.
  • (A)ttributable-identifiable to the person or system that generated the data
  • (L)egible-data can be read and understood
  • (C)ontemporaneous-recording data when it occurs
  • (O)riginal-original recording of data should be the main record; not copies or transcriptions
  • (A)ccurate-a reflection of what happened; error-free

+

  • Available-accessible
  • Enduring-ensuring data is available long-term
  • Consistent-chronological and in an expected sequence
  • Complete-nothing has been deleted or lost

Step 3: Enabling Audit Trails

An audit trail is a secure, computer-generated, time-stamped electronic record that allows for reconstruction of the course of events relating to the creation, modification, or deletion of an electronic record.

An audit trail for a document within an electronic document control system, for instance, should include the author of the document, approvers, date and time of any modifications, and a revision history to justify all changes made to the document. Audit trails may need a periodic review, and this review should be determined using risk assessment tools.

Step 4: Performing Periodic Reviews

Two types of review periods should be established for both paper and electronic Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in the pharmaceutical industry, as detailed below.

  • A review period should be established for determining that content within the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) is still current. If content is outdated, the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) can be revised to update to current processes or regulatory standards.
  • A review period should be established as refresher training for those employees that should be responsible for carrying out the procedures within the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

Implementation of a new electronic system and migration of current procedures can provide many challenges for an organization within the pharmaceutical industry. This may include the multitude of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that need to be revised, training of current and new employees, or scrutiny from global regulatory agencies during inspections.

Moving forward, experienced and knowledgeable resources are vital to help implement the processes necessary for a successful and smooth transition to an electronic system for Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in the pharmaceutical industry.

For questions on migration or further discussion, Please click here to connect with the right resource to respond.

Authored by: Ruth McKnight; Senior Quality and Compliance Specialist, Quality and Compliance.

Suggested For You

perspectives

January 29th, 2024

FDA Draft Guidance on Demonstrating Substantial Evidence Shines a Light on Confirmatory Evidence in Clinical Trials

perspectives

January 10th, 2024

Change Management and Preparing for Computerized System Audits is Critical to Ensure Positive Regulatory Inspections

perspectives

January 4th, 2024

Computer System Validation Needs Greater Attention When Preparing for an FDA Inspection

perspectives

November 30th, 2023

Good Laboratory Practice (GLP): A Validation Approach

perspectives

November 21st, 2023

Quality in Clinical Trials Should be Owned by All Departments: Here’s Why

perspectives

October 31st, 2023

Computerised Systems and Electronic Data in Clinical Trials: New Guidelines and How to Reduce Risk

perspectives

October 19th, 2023

Corrective Action and Preventive Action (CAPA) Adoption for Massive Internal Improvements

perspectives

June 12th, 2023

The Role of Quality Assurance in Outsourcing: Ensuring Regulatory Compliance and Quality

perspectives

May 15th, 2023

Impact of ICH E6(R3) on the Future of Clinical Trials: What You Need to Know

perspectives

May 10th, 2023

Preparing for a GxP Audit Interview: Tips and Considerations for Auditors and Auditees

perspectives

April 14th, 2023

A Comprehensive Guide to Preparing for a Successful Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Inspection

perspectives

April 11th, 2023

5 Expert Tips to Avoid FDA Form 483s in Your Analytical Laboratory