UK Clinical Trial Regulation

The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has recently announced the most significant overhaul of the UK clinical trials regulations in two decades.1 This reform promises to accelerate and streamline the clinical trial approval process, helping to position the UK as a top destination for safe and innovative clinical research.

In this article, we’ll focus on the key changes introduced by the revised UK Clinical Trials Regulation (UK CTR) that may impact on the Development Safety Update Report (DSUR) requirements.

What is the UK Clinical Trials Regulation (UK CTR)?

The original Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004,2 came into effect more than 20 years ago, transposing the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC into UK law. Since then, this regulation has been the cornerstone of clinical trial governance in the UK, focusing on protecting the rights and safety of participants while ensuring the research process is streamlined and compliant.

The MHRA has collaborated with the Health Research Authority (HRA) and the Department of Health in Northern Ireland to carefully consider over 2,000 responses from global stakeholders through the public consultation on proposals for legislative changes.3,4

The updated UK CTR5 was laid before the UK Parliament on December 12, 2024, with a planned implementation in early 2026 following a 12-month transition period.3

What Are the Key Changes for DSURs?

The full details of how the aforementioned changes will affect DSURs are still being finalized, but two of the main items relevant to these reports are as follows:

1. Removal of SAE and SAR Listings from DSURs
One of the most notable changes in the updated UK CTR is the proposal to remove the obligation for including listings of serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious adverse reactions (SARs) in DSURs. Instead, Sponsors will be expected to provide a relevant discussion of the signals and risks associated with the medicinal product, along with proposed risk mitigation strategies.4,5,6

Sponsors are likely already familiar with this approach as it aligns with the 2021 guidance issued jointly by the MHRA and Health Canada7,8, and it mirrors practices already established in the EU.9

Flexibility for Sponsors: Sponsors will still have the option to include SAE and SAR listings in their DSURs if desired,4,5 particularly when preparing global reports. However, those focusing on the UK may find the reduced requirement a more efficient approach. The MHRA may still request SAE and SAR listings if additional investigation into specific safety concerns is needed, giving Sponsors 30 days (or a shorter period, as specified) to provide the data.5

2. Exemption from Submitting DSURs to Research Ethics Committees (RECs)
Another proposed change in the revised UK CTR is the elimination from the requirement to submit DSURs to Research Ethics Committees (RECs).6 Under the new legislation, the MHRA will assume responsibility for assessing DSURs, coordinating with RECs as necessary.4

Clarifying Roles: This new measure seeks to streamline the review process by distinguishing the specific roles of the MHRA and RECs. The MHRA will focus on monitoring ongoing safety data, while RECs will continue their oversight on the ethical aspects of the trial to ensure participant well‑being.4

Benefits for Sponsors: At present, Sponsors are often required to submit the same safety data to both the MHRA and RECs, resulting in unnecessary duplication. By removing this dual reporting requirement, Sponsors can reduce administrative burdens and enhance efficiency, all while maintaining the highest standards of participant safety.

How to Prepare for the Transition and Next Steps

As the updated UK CTR moves through the legislative process, the MHRA and HRA will work together to develop detailed guidance to support its implementation.1,3 Given the expected changes, it’s essential for Sponsors to stay current with the evolving regulatory landscape.

Three ways for Sponsors to prepare are as follows:

  • Monitor updates from the MHRA and HRA throughout the transition period.
  • Review current DSUR processes and evaluate how the changes may affect your submissions.
  • Ensure your team are prepared to adapt to the new DSUR requirements once they are finalized and effective.

Staying informed and being proactive will be key in ensuring compliance with the updated framework and minimizing disruptions to clinical trial operations.

MMS experts are on stand-by to answer any questions related to the content in this article. To be connected with an expert in DSURs or other periodic aggregate safety reports (such as PBRERs and PADERs), email info@mmsholdings.com and we’ll connect you with the right person.

With a strong foothold in the UK and Europe, MMS routinely helps sponsors succeed in building regulatory submissions across all major global health authorities. For details on how MMS helps EU companies gain new drug approval in the US, read this article next.  

References:

  1. MHRA to streamline clinical trial approvals in biggest overhaul of trial regulation in 20 years – GOV.UK
  2. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004
  3. Patients, the NHS and the Life Sciences sector set to benefit from new clinical trials framework being laid in parliament today – GOV.UK
  4. Government response to consultation on legislative proposals for clinical trials – GOV.UK
  5. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) (Amendment) Regulations 2024
  6. Proposals for legislative changes for clinical trials – GOV.UK
  7. MHRA releases guidance in collaboration with Health Canada to improve patient safety in clinical trials through improving the quality of Development Safety Update Reports – GOV.UK
  8. Guideline on how to increase transparency when presenting safety information in the Development Safety Update Report (DSUR): region-specific requirements for Canada and the United Kingdom
  9. CLINICAL TRIALS – REGULATION (EU) NO 536/2014 – QUESTIONS & ANSWERS – VERSION 7

Suggested For You

perspectives

March 27th, 2025

Enhancing Drug Safety Through Digital Solutions: Innovative Technologies in FDA REMS Programs

perspectives

March 6th, 2025

Overview of FDA Guidance for Industry on Assessment of Ovarian Toxicity in Premenopausal Adults During Development for Oncologic Products

perspectives

February 13th, 2025

Helping European Drug Development Companies Succeed in the US Market

perspectives

January 30th, 2025

Post-PDUFA VII Updates: FDA Meetings Public Workshop & Lessons Learned

perspectives

January 21st, 2025

REMS Modifications and Revisions: A Retrospective from the Past 12 Months

perspectives

January 9th, 2025

How to Create Efficiencies When Creating Simultaneous NDA and MAA Submissions for the FDA and EMA

perspectives

January 2nd, 2025

Informed Consent in Clinical Research: Understanding its Significance and Sponsor Obligations

perspectives

December 17th, 2024

Oncology Drug Development: Webinar Learnings on the Use of Expedited Pathways and Oncology Center of Excellence Programs

perspectives

December 11th, 2024

Why Emerging Biotech Companies are Increasingly Turning to Specialized Data CROs

perspectives

November 26th, 2024

Finding GRASEland: Navigating the New Regulatory Path for Grandfathered OTC Drugs 

perspectives

November 21st, 2024

Essential Nonclinical Strategies for Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) Success

perspectives

November 12th, 2024

REMS Logic Modeling: Applying FDA Guidance from November 2024 CDER Webinar