Why Every Pharmaceutical Company Needs to Plan for Drug Product Labeling Early in Clinical Studies

For many scientists and healthcare professionals involved in developing new medicines, patients, the people who represent the unmet need, are a primary motivating factor. To ensure that patients and physicians can make full use of a product’s potential, conveying information on a product’s optimal use must be written clearly and effectively. Although decisions on what will be included in drug product labeling are not finalized until just prior to marketing authorization, it is important to begin the drug development process by thinking about drug product labeling requirements in clinical studies and how best to convey this information.  

As Stephen Covey said, “begin with the end in mind.” 

Drug product label requirements 

Drug product labeling takes several forms depending on the regional requirements and the prescribing status of a medicine. For instance, this may include the United States Prescribing Information (USPI) or the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) used by the EMA.   

Each of these has specific requirements based on the legislation and guidance of the applicable regions.  

Carefully interpreting the clinical data into labeling language is a monumental task. Unfortunately, a drug’s reach and the return on investment may be limited by inadequate forethought and planning, resulting in noncompliance and relabelling, as well as wasted effort if applications are denied or authorization is delayed. 

Planning ahead for drug product labeling  

When thinking about drug product labeling, the first step would ideally be to develop a Target Product Profile (TPP) that answers (or at least proposes possible answers to) the following questions: 

  • Who is the product for? 
  • What does the product do, is it a treatment for a condition, or does it manage or diagnose symptoms? 
  • What is the pharmacological profile, what is the best dose, and how often does it need to be administered? 
  • How can the efficacy be best described or quantified? 
  • What is the safety profile, and is that consistent across all patient groups? 

In answering these questions, the building blocks of a new drug product label are created. Although it can seem time–consuming in early development to be thinking about what the finished product labeling will look like, all of the wording in a product label must be supported by evidence.  

The TPP forms a baseline for information that needs to be generated through the development program to support a label. Indeed, if we think of the Common Technical Document (CTD) used for regulatory submissions, it is a pyramid structure. The product labeling is part of the pyramid’s tip and is supported by all the evidence presented in the lower-tier modules. 

Beginning with the end in mind and planning ahead in this manner will mean that by the time a product has demonstrated efficacy in the pivotal clinical trial program, the information deemed valuable for inclusion in a product label should be readily available.   

Timing is critical 

Suppose a particular statistical method is best to describe the efficacy to prescribers, for instance. In that case, this method will have been captured. Or, if a certain patient group may require dose adjustments, the pharmacokinetics modeling to support this will be in place.  

Once submission activities for a product authorization commence, it is not the time that a team would want to discover that additional work is required to substantiate a piece of valuable information. Planning the TPP and product label in advance can avoid this. 

An effective solution 

It’s important to support the initial development and ongoing maintenance of TPPs with the timing described above, turning these into an emerging Company Core Data Sheet (eCCDS) throughout the product development. The eCCDS  (which can be appended to the Investigator’s Brochure or used to produce draft product labeling for regulatory interactions (e.g., pre-NDA) typically captures the minimum information required to convey a Sponsor’s position on how to safely and effectively administer a medicine and meet most regional requirements. 

Ultimately this then transitions to the CCDS, ready to be translated into the required product labeling for each region where a product authorization is sought.  

By: Victoria Woodham, Senior Medical Writer 

For additional questions on product labeling, fill out this form and we’ll connect you with Victoria. 

Suggested For You

perspectives

July 16th, 2024

Key Steps to Successful CMC Authoring of IND and IMPD Submissions

perspectives

June 21st, 2024

Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles: The Crucial Role of Publication in the Pharmaceutical Industry

perspectives

April 19th, 2024

The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Global Medical Writing

perspectives

November 2nd, 2023

Comparability Studies for Biologics: What Drug Developers Need to Succeed

perspectives

October 11th, 2023

Understanding the Revised Draft Guidance for Formal Meetings with the FDA

perspectives

August 16th, 2023

Automatiqc®: Bridging the Gap Between AI Precision and Human Expertise in Medical Writing and Quality Control

perspectives

July 6th, 2023

3 Tips for CSR Writing: Best Practices for Lean and Effective Clinical Study Report Writing

perspectives

April 6th, 2023

A Reflection on My Medical Writing Career: The Art of Mentoring

perspectives

June 14th, 2022

Medical Writing Trends in the Era of COVID-19 and Remote Work: Enhancing Virtual Relationships and Emphasizing Emotional Intelligence

perspectives

March 24th, 2022

How to Succeed in the Pharma Industry: Conversations with Instructors at MMS Academy Part 1

perspectives

December 1st, 2021

FDA Expedited Program Designations to Support Rare Disease Drug Development

perspectives

October 8th, 2021

How to use a Master Protocol to gain Efficiencies in a Clinical Trial